When homeowners in Ontario look for a second mortgage, many assume there are only two options: “the bank” or “private money.”
In reality, the second-mortgage market is made up of several very different types of lenders, each with its own rules, pricing, risk tolerance, and approval process.
Understanding how these lenders operate — and where your file fits — can make the difference between a manageable short-term solution and a long-term financial problem.
This article breaks down the major types of second mortgage lenders in Ontario, from traditional banks to private individual investors.
Banks typically offer second-position financing through Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs).
These are revolving credit facilities registered behind a first mortgage.
• Strong credit
• Stable, verifiable income
• Low combined loan-to-value (LTV)
• Clean credit history
• Lowest interest rates
• Flexible repayment
• Revolving access to funds
• Very strict underwriting
• Easy for banks to reduce or freeze
• Rarely available in financial distress
• Not accessible for most second-mortgage borrowers
For borrowers who qualify, HELOCs are the cheapest form of second-position financing. However, most homeowners seeking a second mortgage do not meet bank underwriting standards.
Between major banks and private lenders sit credit unions and alternative “Alt-A/B” lenders.
These institutions operate with more flexibility than banks but still rely heavily on income and credit scoring.
• Moderate underwriting flexibility
• Policy-driven approvals
• Income still required
• Moderate turnaround times
• Lower cost than private lending
• Some flexibility
• Institutional oversight
• Still decline many files
• Slow approvals
• Limited exceptions
• Less suitable for urgent situations
This category works well for near-prime borrowers who fall just outside traditional bank guidelines.
Mortgage Investment Corporations pool investor capital and lend according to defined risk and return parameters.
They represent “institutional private lending.”
• Pooled investor funds
• Standardized lending criteria
• LTV and location limits
• Formal underwriting process
• Predictable terms
• Professional administration
• Stable funding sources
• Regulatory structure
• Less flexible than individuals
• Policy caps
• Limited exceptions
• Renewal risk
MICs are well suited for borrowers with strong equity positions but non-traditional income or credit challenges.
Some companies act as capital marketplaces or administrators, connecting borrowers to structured private capital.
Examples include:
• LendHub
• Prudent Financial
These firms typically manage relationships with multiple lenders and funds.
• Centralized underwriting
• Compliance systems
• Access to multiple funding sources
• Broker-facing infrastructure
• Access to broad capital
• Process consistency
• Professional servicing
• Pricing bands
• Less customization
• Limited negotiation
• Policy restrictions
These platforms provide scale and compliance, but flexibility is often reduced compared to direct private investors.
Some borrowers turn to high-cost consumer lenders when traditional mortgage financing is unavailable.
A well-known example is:
• easyfinancial
These lenders operate at the high end of the cost spectrum.
• Very high interest rates
• Short terms
• Risk-based pricing
• Minimal documentation
• Fast funding
• Low qualification thresholds
• Expensive
• Can worsen cash flow
• Limited long-term viability
• Often a last resort
While these lenders serve a purpose in emergencies, they are rarely optimal for long-term real estate financing.
Private individual lenders form the backbone of Ontario’s true private mortgage market.
These are investors who lend their own capital, often through self-directed registered accounts.
• Professionals
• Business owners
• Retirees
• Family offices
• Self-directed RRSP holders
• Registered directly on title
• Secured by real property
• Structured through licensed brokers
• Customized terms
• Maximum flexibility
• Fast approvals
• Custom structures
• Willingness to fund complex files
• Suitable for distress situations
• Higher rates
• Requires disciplined exit planning
• Strong structuring required
Private individual lenders are often the only viable option for borrowers facing time pressure, legal issues, income challenges, or complex financial situations.
Lender TypeSpeedCostFlexibilityBest ForBank HELOCSlowLowLowStrong borrowersAlt/B LendersMediumMediumMediumNear-prime borrowersMICsMediumHighMediumEquity-rich borrowersPlatformsMediumHighMediumStructured private dealsSubprimeFastVery HighLowEmergenciesPrivate IndividualsFastestHighHighestComplex or distressed files
Many homeowners only see a small portion of the available lending market.
Common reasons include:
• Banks do not refer declined files
• Borrowers are unaware of private capital
• Poor file presentation
• Inexperienced brokerage
• Delayed action
• Unrealistic expectations
As a result, many borrowers either overpay unnecessarily or miss viable solutions entirely.
In second mortgages, the lender type matters — but structure matters more.
A properly structured second mortgage considers:
• Registration priority
• Exit strategy
• Refinance timing
• Property marketability
• Cash flow impact
• Legal compliance
A low rate on a poorly structured deal often costs more than a higher rate on a well-planned one.
Ontario’s second mortgage market is diverse, layered, and highly specialized.
From bank HELOCs to private registered investors, each lender category serves a specific purpose.
The key is matching the right borrower, the right property, and the right timeline to the appropriate source of capital.
When that alignment is done properly, second mortgages can be effective financial tools. When it is done poorly, they become long-term liabilities.
If you are exploring second-position financing, the lender type matters as much as the rate.
A properly structured file can save tens of thousands of dollars in interest, fees, and lost equity over time.
A professional review before committing is often the most valuable step in the process.